Must be able to make an excellent print of a unique subject or original view of a known Leaves room for improvement such as a less-than-perfect angle or not Every bit as good as 3 stars but with a strong and interesting point of interest, although it Interesting compositions with a clean discernible subject. This is an almost technically perfect photo, potentially improved with straightening, cropping or dust removal but theĪdjusted results show good focus, sharpness, exposure and.Not quite good enough to show but interesting for souvenir and recollection. Interesting photo with some technical flaws.Technical flaws can be numerous but not enough to warrantĭeletion (which happens for 70-80% or so of my images but that's another A photo kept only for sentimental value.When putting the ratings into goal-oriented terms, my ratings can be interpreted as follows: One must consider the goal of a rating system but 5 stars is so coarse that I find myself often wishing Lightroom allowed for 1/2-star steps. Intended subject, sharpness must be impeccable and framing must showĭespite a precise idea, there is some room for interpretation, so I usually give myself some calibration rounds where I rate a subset of photos over and over until I give each photo the same rating each time while going through the set. That has all those qualities plus a compelling subject and noįor a photo to get 5 stars it needs to qualify for 4 plus offer no ![]() The subject is shown clearly and nothing detracts from payingĪ photo which is missing one of those qualities gets 2 stars. ![]() Sharp and no major area is under or over-exposed. The 3-star mark is what I reserve for a perfect photo: The subject is Even though I consider myself to be very rigorous, I find that there is a drift over time. There are no standards as much of it is subjective. Maybe there is a tagging standard? When I searched for these things online all I could find is how to use a 5 star rating system in a specific piece of software or how to implement one on your website, etc. I realize I could also tag such images as slightly blurry. Ideally this would help me later find photos that could be corrected with additional post processing or future technologies such as advanced blur correction. ![]() 1 stars - photo is very blurred and/or has poor light levels.2 stars - photo is too blurry or light levels are.3 stars - Sharpness or light levels are good, but photo composition is not as intended.4 stars - Photo composition is good, but sharpness or light levels are a bit less than perfect.5 stars - Photo has perfect or near perfect sharpness of the subject, subject composition is as intended, light levels are perfect.I'm looking for something that will make rating the images less subjective and give me specific photographic qualities to look for to reduce the effect of rating skew.Īs an example that I just made up now, something like this: This has me wondering, has anyone developed a set of recommended standards for what qualifies a photo as 5 stars, 4 stars, etc. I'm preparing to go through thousands of photos and organize them and part of that is to give each one a rating of 1 to 5 stars.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |